con el pais dividido en el voto popular (nbc 47-47, romney arriba en gallup 52-45, y rasmussen 47-46) el negro y el mormon salen a fajarse otra vez. esta vez se discutira sobre como matar enemigos y pelear en ultramar, nuestro fuerte. en eso el religioso parece llevar las de perder porque no ha matado a nadie pero cuidado porque las sangrientas cruzadas medievales fueron guerras santas tambien. y cualquier cura jala una espada o se saca el rabo por debajo de la sotana. pero como hay que guiarse por algo, en los ultimos 32 años, los unicos que perdieron la eleccion estando arriba en las encuestas de octubre fueron carter contra reagan y gore contra bush el ñame. lo de reagan fue genuino, fue ese margen de error de toda encuesta; pero lo de bush no. asi que todo parece indicar que obama, para re-elegirse, lo haria con el llamado voto electoral porque el voto popular parece que lo tiene ligeramente perdido. por ejemplo, si obama gana en california, agarra 55 votos electorales de los 271 que necesita a su favor para reelegirse. pero no puede darse el lujo de perder la florida y ohio, como swing states (el swing sate, como se sabe, es el que lo mismo vota por uno que por otro, sin fidelidad ni tradicion politica sino por puteria) por eso la campaña presidencial al final se enfoca en las putas y los indecisos, que son, para colmo, quienes nos deciden la democracia. y esto no se refleja en las encuestas. aun asi, si esta noche el gobernador de massachusetts le muerde la oreja al presidente o si el hawaiiano le saca la lengua al mormon, la gente impresionable pudiera quedar impactada hasta el 6 de noviembre. a favor de cualquiera. se ha dado el caso de gente que no recuerda por quien voto pero si quien gano el ultimo debate. por eso mismo yo, que iba a ver un partido de baloncesto, cambie de idea.©varela
with the country divided into the popular vote (nbc 47-47, romney's 52-45 gallup and rasmussen 47-46) the nigga and the mormon go to fight again. this time will be about how to kill enemies and fight overseas, our strength. that the religious seems to take the losing part because he has not killed anyone but be careful 'cause the medieval bloodied crusades were also holy wars. and any priest pulls a sword or shows the tail under the cassock. and as it must be guided by something, in the last 32 years, the only who lost the election still up in october polls were carter against reagan and gore against bush the yam. reagan was genuine, was the margin of error for all survey; but bush doesn't. so everything seems to indicate that obama, to be re-elected, it would do with the so-called electoral vote because the popular vote appears to have it slightly lost. for example, if obama wins california, grabs 55 electoral votes of the 271 needed in his favor for re-election. but he can not afford the luxury of losing florida and ohio, as swing states (swing sate, as we know, is that the same rate by one to another, without loyalty or political tradition but by puteria) is why the presidential campaign at the end focuses on the whores and the undecided, who are, to make matters worse, those who choose our democracy. and this is not reflected in the polls. even so, if tonight the governor of massachusetts bites the ear to the president or the hawaiian takes out the tongue to the mormon, impressionable people may be impacted until november 6. in favour of anyone. it has been the case of people who doesn't remember for who voted but who won the last debate. that's why, since i was going to see a basketball game, i changed my mind.©varela
with the country divided into the popular vote (nbc 47-47, romney's 52-45 gallup and rasmussen 47-46) the nigga and the mormon go to fight again. this time will be about how to kill enemies and fight overseas, our strength. that the religious seems to take the losing part because he has not killed anyone but be careful 'cause the medieval bloodied crusades were also holy wars. and any priest pulls a sword or shows the tail under the cassock. and as it must be guided by something, in the last 32 years, the only who lost the election still up in october polls were carter against reagan and gore against bush the yam. reagan was genuine, was the margin of error for all survey; but bush doesn't. so everything seems to indicate that obama, to be re-elected, it would do with the so-called electoral vote because the popular vote appears to have it slightly lost. for example, if obama wins california, grabs 55 electoral votes of the 271 needed in his favor for re-election. but he can not afford the luxury of losing florida and ohio, as swing states (swing sate, as we know, is that the same rate by one to another, without loyalty or political tradition but by puteria) is why the presidential campaign at the end focuses on the whores and the undecided, who are, to make matters worse, those who choose our democracy. and this is not reflected in the polls. even so, if tonight the governor of massachusetts bites the ear to the president or the hawaiian takes out the tongue to the mormon, impressionable people may be impacted until november 6. in favour of anyone. it has been the case of people who doesn't remember for who voted but who won the last debate. that's why, since i was going to see a basketball game, i changed my mind.©varela