voy a decirlo una sola vez y guardenlo que no voy a estar con ustedes toda una vida: obama gano por el twitter. alli estan los 3 millones de diferencia. es un tech enthusiast, con su white house-issued de blackberry y los pics mostrandolo con un ipad. el team de romney no reflejo esa tecnologia en imagenes, si acaso paul ryan. obama tuiteo el doble de romney, por tanto llego a una poblacion mas amplia, se comunico mas. ya no importa entrar a una fabrica en mangas de camisa a charlar con los obreros sino enviarle a cada uno, a traves del sindicato, un texteo. obama trabajo las uniones via websites, su rival no. la cibernetica le hizo a obama el trabajo que le hubiera hecho un tercer candidato robandole votos al republicano. y de ahi para alla, la indiscrecion de romney en la conversacion de sobremesa en boca raton le quito realmente, de hecho el 47%. si al republicano su lengua larga le costo medio electorado, a gary hart el cosquilleo de la entrepierna le costo la candidatura democrata cuando un fotografo y un reportero del herald se le apostaron frente al townhouse al salir su singante en 1987. asi que miren si las indiscreciones son fatales en la politica. no es el comunismo, ni los fantasmas hollywoodenses del macartismo. empezando porque no representaron al hispano en la convencion del gop. marco rubio no es visto como hispano. en cambio julian castro si. y eva longoria arrastra mas votos que clint eastwood. no estamos en la epoca de dirty harry sino en la de desperates housewives y sex & the city. tampoco se puede ganar ignorando a los uniformados. colin powell primero y la tormenta perfecta despues se llevaron a los reclutas, los policias y los bomberos con el negro. y todavia critican al gobernador de nueva jersey, que es gobernador de un estado, no sargento politico de campaña alguna. y que las mujeres se identificaron mas con la michelle, musculosa y a lo narciso rodriguez; no con la ann, fofa, tradicional -picua- mujer de mormon y ama de casa. estamos en el siglo 21. en la imagen perenne y morbosa. nada de convencionalismos ni con el hombre. y esos analistas que no sepan mandar un msm de 100 palabras en menos de 30 segundos, no analizan nada de hoy, por eso no vieron la victoria del presidente. y mucho menos la visualizaron los recien llegados cubanos y esos phd que se creen que saben... y son unos comemierdas. es que no hubo ni wishful thinking sino cruda y dura ignorancia.
©varela
i'm going to say it one time and seize, that i won't be with you a lifetime: obama won by the use of twitter. there is the 3 million difference. is a tech enthusiast, with his white house-issued blackberry and pics showing him with an ipad. the romney team not reflected that technology in images, only paul ryan. obama twittered doubled as romney's, therefore came to a wider population, communicate more. no longer matters to come to a factory in shirtsleeves to chat with workers but to send a text to each one, through the union. obama worked workers via websites, his rival no. cybernetics made obama the job that a third candidate would have made him stealing votes to the republican. then from there, the indiscretion of romney in the table talk in boca raton took out really, in fact 47%. if the republican's long tongue cost him half electorate, gary hart crotch tickling cost him the democrat candidacy when a photographer and a reporter for the herald had staked against his townhouse to see going out his singante in 1987. so look if the indiscretions are fatal in politics. it's not communism, nor the hollywood ghosts of mc'carthyism. starting because they did not represent the hispanic at the gop convention. marco rubio is not seen as hispanic. julian castro in contrast does. and eva longoria carries more votes than clint eastwood. we are not in the dirty harry's era but in the desperates housewives and sex & the city's. you can win neither ignoring the uniformed. colin powell first and the perfect storm later got the recruits, policemen and firefighters with the nigga. and still they criticize the new jersey governor , who is governor of a state, not political sergeant of any campaign. and women were identified more with michelle, muscular and narciso rodriguez's; not with the ann, chubby, traditional -tacky- mormon girl and housewife. we are in the 21st century. in the perennial atractive and morbid image. no conventions even with the man. and these analysts who don't know how to send a 100-word msm in less than 30 seconds, don't analyze anything today, by that did not see the victory of the president. and much less viewed it the recently arrived cubans and those phd who believe that they know... and really they know nothing. it's that neither wishful thinking was there but crude and harsh ignorance.©varela
