2 buenos articulos (
newyorker y
huffpost) traen par de temas interesantes. los republicanos no solo se alarmaron por la perdida de la florida, virginia, colorado y nevada sino por la manera como ganaron texas, el estado mas conservador de la union desde 1980, casa de 3 presidentes en el ultimo medio siglo y mesa de 39 votos electorales. texas practicamente se convirtio en otro campo de batalla porque romney cogio alli 5 millones de votos contra 4 obama, pero el nigga se llevo el 70% del hispano que, con la mayor tasa de crecimiento de poblacion despues de la negra, sugiere una posible perdida del estado en la eleccion del 16. ya el experto
carlos gutierrez, consejero del mormon en la pasada campaña, hablo sobre ello a la prensa el sabado y encima aseguro que los hispanos le tienen miedo al partido republicano. vamos, que el grasoso no solo ve a su vecino republicano con la capucha del kkk sino como un tipo que ademas no comparte la ayuda federal (se estima que el 60% de la membresia del ku-klux-klan coge medicaid, retiro, incapacidad laboral, food stamps y otras asistencias del gobierno). la melcocha que nos quieren vender los conservadores de que obama es quien deporta y olvida a los hispanos se disuelve con el horror de arizona. pero ademas, el voto negro subira igual en los estados sureños de louisiana, mississippi, alabama y georgia, lo que haria imposible una proxima eleccion de candidato republicano a partir de los proximos 8 años aunque fuera negro o hispano porque ya no es cuestion de raza sino de dinero. al final, rush limbaugh tiene razon: no se le puede ganar a santa claus. pero la opcion no es matarle el venado ni sellarle la chimenea sino traer a los 3 reyes magos para competir con el. por lo tanto los republicanos tienen que montarse en camellos, echarse sacos al lomo y empezar a dar regalos, si quieren otra presidencia. eso significa re-inventarse, incluso cerrar su partido y crear otro. con nuevas alianzas domesticas, estrategia en ultramar y lineamientos morales con el legrado y la mariconeria. o revivir el
whig party (1833-1860)... una variante bastante tentadora para la epoca en que vivimos. no lo digo yo, lo dice gente que sabe mas que yo (
ted cruz).
©varela
2 good articles (newyorker and huffpost) bring a couple of interesting topics. the republicans not only were alarmed by the loss of florida, virginia, colorado and nevada but by the way they won texas, the most conservative state of the union since 1980, home of 3 presidents in the last half century and table of 39 electoral votes. texas virtually was turned into another battlefield state because romney caught there 5 million votes against 4 obama, but the nigga took 70 percent of the hispanic's which, with the highest rate of population growth after the blacks, suggests a possible loss of the state in the choice of 16. last saturday, the expert carlos gutierrez, adviser of the mormon in the last campaign, talk to the press about it and even assures that hispanics are afraid of the republican party. come on, that greasy not only sees the republican neighbor with the kkk hood but that also as a guy who doesn't share the federal aid (it's estimated that 60% of the membership of the ku-klux-klan picks up medicaid, retirement, disability, food stamps and other government assistance). the marshmallow that the conservatives sell to us that obama is who deports and forgets hispanics it's dissolved with the arizona horror. but also, in the same way the black vote will rise in the southern states of louisiana, mississippi, alabama and georgia, which would make impossible a next election of any republican candidate from the coming 8 years though it was black or hispanic because it's no longer a matter of race but money. at the end, rush limbaugh is right: no one can beats santa claus. but the option is not to kill the deer or to seal the chimney but to bring the 3 biblical kings to compete with him. therefore the republicans have mounted on camels, lying sacks to the back and start giving gifts, if they want another presidency. that means to be re-invented, even closing their party and to create another. with new domestic alliances, overseas strategey and moral guidelines with the curettage and the gay affair. or to revive the whig party (1833-1860)... a pretty tempting turnoff for the era in which we live. i don't mean it, it says by people who know it more than me (ted cruz).©varela
